|
Advanced search
Previous page
|
Title
Media Framing of Human Trafficking: a Comparative Study of Addis Zemen and The Reporter |
Full text
http://etd.aau.edu.et/handle/123456789/3604 |
Date
2017 |
Author(s)
Tesfaye, Addishiwot |
Contributor(s)
Chakrabarti, Debashis (Professer) |
Abstract
This study was conducted with the aim of investigating how human trafficking issue was
framed by the selected newspapers in comparative perspective. Qualitative content analysis
(textual analysis) used as a major approach. Further in-depth interview was conducted with
six media professionals. The study employed framing theory and political economy of the
mass media as the theoretical framework.
Two newspapers-Addis Zemen from the government and Amharic Reporter from the private
press were selected purposively as source of data. The research was conducted based on
eleven-month time frame (from October 11th, 2013 up to February 9th, 2014 and February 10th
2015 up to August 6th 2015 and November 2014). The data from each newspaper were also
gathered by following periods of special events like in 2013 more than hundred thousand
Ethiopian human trafficking victims returned from Saudi Arabia due to 'illegality' and in
2015 more than dozen of Ethiopian who travel Libya were slaughtered by ISIS.
The study revealed that morality frame was the most predominant frame used by Addis
Zemen whereas Amharic Reporter used attribution of responsibility dominantly. Both
newspapers used solution frame almost similarly. Addis Zemen failed to use conflict frame in
the framing of human trafficking stories whereas Amharic Reporter used conflict frame to
report disagreement. Both Addis Zemen and Amharic Reporter was failed to give enough
emphasis to internal trafficking rather they significantly emphasize on the external one.
Moreover, there was no consistency and fair coverage of human trafficking issue in the
selected time frame. In both newspapers variation has been seen in highlighting and
emphasizing the causes. In Addis Zemen, broker initiatives or the act of trafficker made
salient through repeating the same message Amharic Reporter mentioned diverse cause but
poverty as cause appeared repeatedly. Addis Zemen utilized government sources dominantly.
In contrast, Amharic Reporter relatively utilized researches and international human
trafficking reports as sources of information. So, Addis Zemen reflects the view of the
government in framing human trafficking stories, whereas Amharic Reporter relatively fair in
framing the issue. |
Subject(s)
Human Trafficking |
Language
en |
Publisher
Addis Ababa University |
Type of publication
Thesis |
Format
application/pdf |
Repository
Addis Ababa - University of Addis Ababa
|
Added to C-A: 2021-01-11;11:05:03 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2024 | Last update: Saturday, July 6, 2024 |
Webmaster
|