|
Advanced search
Previous page
 |
Title
Gender, migration and HIV in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. |
Full text
https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nq0s9wq |
Date
2010 |
Author(s)
Camlin, Carol S; Hosegood, Victoria; Newell, Marie-Louise; McGrath, Nuala; Bärnighausen, Till; Snow, Rachel C |
Abstract
ObjectivesResearch on migration and HIV has largely focused on male migration, often failing to measure HIV risks associated with migration for women. We aimed to establish whether associations between migration and HIV infection differ for women and men, and identify possible mechanisms by which women's migration contributes to their high infection risk.DesignData on socio-demographic characteristics, patterns of migration, sexual behavior and HIV infection status were obtained for a population of 11,677 women aged 15-49 and men aged 15-54, resident members of households within a demographic surveillance area participating in HIV surveillance in 2003-04.MethodsLogistic regression was conducted to examine whether sex and migration were independently associated with HIV infection in three additive effects models, using measures of recent migration, household presence and migration frequency. Multiplicative effects models were fitted to explore whether the risk of HIV associated with migration differed for males and females. Further modeling and simulations explored whether composition or behavioral differences accounted for observed associations.ResultsRelative to non-migrant males, non-migrant females had higher odds of being HIV-positive (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.72; 95% confidence interval [1.49-1.99]), but odds were higher for female migrants (aOR = 2.55 [2.07-3.13]). Female migrants also had higher odds of infection relative to female non-migrants (aOR = 1.48 [1.23-1.77]). The association between number of sexual partners over the lifetime and HIV infection was modified by both sex and migrant status: For male non-migrants, each additional partner was associated with 3% higher odds of HIV infection (aOR = 1.03 [1.02-1.05]); for male migrants the association between number of partners and HIV infection was non-significant. Each additional partner increased odds of HIV infection by 22% for female non-migrants (aOR = 1.22 [1.12-1.32]) and 46% for female migrants (aOR = 1.46 [1.25-1.69]).ConclusionsHigher risk sexual behavior in the context of migration increased women's likelihood of HIV infection. |
Subject(s)
Humans; HIV Infections; Logistic Models; Sexual Behavior; Emigration and Immigration; Adolescent; Adult; Middle Aged; Rural Population; South Africa; Female; Male; Young Adult; Behavioral and Social Science; Sexually Transmitted Infections; Clinical Research; HIV/AIDS; Infectious Diseases; Reproductive health and childbirth; Infection; Decent Work and Economic Growth; General Science & Technology |
Coverage
e11539 |
Publisher
eScholarship, University of California |
Type of publication
article |
Format
application/pdf |
Source
PloS one, vol 5, iss 7 |
Rights
public |
Identifier
qt4nq0s9wq |
Repository
Berkeley - University of California
|
Added to C-A: 2022-07-20;10:41:38 |
© Connecting-Africa 2004-2022 | Last update: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 |
Webmaster
|